🤖 Daily Inference
Monday, February 23, 2026
Good morning! This weekend served up a genuinely varied spread of AI news - from a quiet but important Google research paper that could cut your AI costs in half, to a deeply unsettling story about ChatGPT and a Canadian school shooting suspect. We've also got NVIDIA releasing a massive open-source robot training model, a Google VP issuing a stark warning to AI startups, and Microsoft's new gaming boss drawing a hard line against AI-generated junk. Let's get into it.
⚡ Google Finds a Way to Cut LLM Inference Costs by Half
One of the most practically significant AI research findings this weekend came not from a headline-grabbing product launch but from a Google AI research paper proposing what the team calls a "Deep-Thinking Ratio." The core idea is deceptively simple: not every query sent to a large language model actually needs the full weight of the model's reasoning capabilities brought to bear on it. By intelligently calibrating how much "deep thinking" a model applies to any given input, the researchers found they could significantly improve accuracy while simultaneously cutting total inference costs - the cost of actually running the model - by around half.
This matters enormously in practice. Inference costs are the quiet killer of AI business models - training a model is a one-time expense, but serving it to millions of users every day is an ongoing and often staggering bill. If Google's approach holds up at scale, it could meaningfully change the economics of deploying AI products, making powerful reasoning models accessible to companies that previously couldn't afford the compute. It's the kind of efficiency gain that doesn't make for flashy demos but could reshape the AI infrastructure landscape over the next year.
For anyone building or investing in AI-powered products, this is the research paper worth reading this week. Keep an eye on how quickly this approach gets adopted in production systems - efficiency breakthroughs like this tend to move fast once the research is out.
⚠️ OpenAI Debated Alerting Police About Suspected Canadian School Shooter
One of the most uncomfortable AI stories of the weekend involves OpenAI and a suspect in a school shooting in Tumbler Ridge, Canada. According to reports from both TechCrunch and The Verge, the suspect had described violent scenarios to ChatGPT in the period before the attack. OpenAI apparently became aware of this and internally debated whether to alert Canadian authorities - raising a profound and still-unresolved question about the responsibilities of AI companies when their tools surface potentially dangerous content or intent.
This story cuts to the heart of several tensions that have been simmering in the AI industry. ChatGPT and similar tools are designed to be open-ended and non-judgmental conversational partners - which is precisely what makes them useful, and also what makes them potentially concerning in cases like this. When does a user's conversation cross a line that obligates the company to act? What legal frameworks exist to guide that decision? And what does it mean for chatbot safety more broadly that these conversations are happening at all?
There are no easy answers here, and to be clear, the reports don't suggest OpenAI acted negligently - the debate itself shows they were grappling with it seriously. But this case is likely to intensify calls for clearer AI regulation around when and how AI companies must report concerning user activity to law enforcement.
🤖 NVIDIA Releases DreamDojo - A Robot World Model Trained on 44,711 Hours of Human Video
On the robotics front, NVIDIA dropped something quietly significant this weekend: DreamDojo, an open-source robot world model trained on an almost staggering 44,711 hours of real-world human video data. A "world model" in this context is a system that learns to simulate and predict how the physical world behaves - it's not just about recognizing objects, but understanding how actions lead to consequences in physical space. That kind of grounding is crucial for building robots that can operate reliably outside of controlled lab environments.
The scale of the training data is what makes DreamDojo noteworthy. Tens of thousands of hours of human video gives the model a rich, diverse foundation for understanding how humans move through and interact with the world - which is exactly the kind of knowledge that's proven difficult to transfer to robotic systems. By releasing this as open source, NVIDIA is also making a strategic bet: put powerful tools in the hands of the research community and accelerate the broader ecosystem rather than keeping everything proprietary.
If you're following the race to build general-purpose robots, DreamDojo is worth bookmarking. World models are increasingly seen as a key missing piece in the puzzle, and having a well-trained open-source baseline could meaningfully accelerate research across the field. Check out our AI research coverage for more on developments like this.
🏢 A Google VP Just Issued a Stark Warning to Two Types of AI Startups
While the robotics world absorbs DreamDojo, a Google VP made waves over the weekend with a pointed warning: two types of AI startups may simply not survive the current wave of AI development. The remarks, reported by TechCrunch, reflect a growing anxiety in the startup ecosystem about what happens when the big foundation model providers keep expanding the capabilities included natively in their models.
The concern is one that's been discussed in venture capital circles for a while but is now being stated more openly by insiders at major AI labs: startups that are essentially thin wrappers around existing foundation models, and startups that are building in capability areas that the major labs are clearly moving toward, are increasingly at risk. When GPT or Gemini gains a new built-in capability, any startup that had been charging for that capability as a standalone product faces an existential problem. This is sometimes called getting "Sherlocked" - named after when Apple builds a feature into its OS that kills a third-party app.
The warning is a useful reality check for founders and investors alike. The AI startup landscape is full of genuine opportunity, but it requires building on defensible differentiation - proprietary data, unique workflows, deep domain expertise, or distribution advantages - rather than simply riding the capabilities of the underlying models. Follow our AI investments coverage for more on the evolving startup landscape.
🏢 Microsoft's New Gaming Chief Vows to Fight 'Endless AI Slop'
In a refreshingly direct statement, Microsoft's new gaming CEO drew a clear line in the sand this weekend: the gaming ecosystem will not be flooded with "endless AI slop" on their watch. The remarks, reported by TechCrunch, come as the games industry grapples seriously with what AI-generated content means for game quality, developer jobs, and player trust.
The term "AI slop" - low-quality, algorithmically generated content produced at scale with minimal human craft or intention - has become a cultural flashpoint across creative industries. In gaming, the fear is that publishers under financial pressure will use generative AI to cut corners on art assets, narrative writing, voice acting, and even level design, flooding the market with technically functional but creatively hollow experiences. Microsoft's new gaming leadership signaling awareness of this risk is meaningful given the company's enormous footprint in the industry, from Xbox to Activision Blizzard.
Whether strong words translate into strong policies remains to be seen, but the fact that a major gaming executive is publicly framing AI quality as a trust issue - not just a cost issue - reflects a maturation in how the industry is thinking about AI content quality. Builders and creators in adjacent industries should pay attention: the backlash against low-effort AI content is building.
Speaking of building quality digital experiences - if you're looking to launch a clean, professional web presence without the overhead of a full dev project, 60sec.site is an AI website builder that helps you get something polished live fast. Worth a look.
⚠️ Bernie Sanders Calls for Slowing Down the AI Revolution
Rounding out today's edition with a story that sits at the intersection of AI regulation and politics: Senator Bernie Sanders issued a pointed warning this weekend about the speed and scale of the coming AI revolution, arguing that the US currently has "no clue" about how to handle what's coming. Reported by The Guardian, Sanders called for slowing the pace of AI deployment until better safeguards and policy frameworks are in place.
Sanders' concerns center on the future of work and economic displacement - themes he has consistently championed throughout his career. His argument is essentially that the benefits of AI are accruing rapidly to corporations and shareholders while the risks of automation and job loss fall disproportionately on working people, and that regulators are moving far too slowly relative to the technology's pace of change. It's a perspective shared by a growing number of economists and labor advocates, even if it's contested by the tech industry.
Whether or not you agree with Sanders' prescription, the underlying tension he's identifying is real and increasingly urgent. The gap between how fast AI is being deployed and how fast policy can respond to it is one of the defining challenges of this moment - and it's one that will shape the economic impact of AI for years to come. We've been following this debate closely at Daily Inference - visit dailyinference.com for our full archive of AI policy and regulation coverage.
💬 What Do You Think?
Today's newsletter raised a question that's been sitting with me: when OpenAI's team discovered that a school shooting suspect had described violent scenarios to ChatGPT, they apparently debated whether to call the police. Should AI companies be legally required to report conversations that suggest imminent violent intent - and if so, where exactly should that line be drawn? This is genuinely hard: erring too far toward reporting risks chilling free expression and overwhelming law enforcement with false positives, while erring the other way could mean missing real warning signs. Hit reply and tell me where you'd draw the line - I read every response and reply to as many as I can.
That's all for today's edition. A lot to chew on - from efficiency breakthroughs to ethical dilemmas to industry warnings. If any of these stories sparked a thought, hit reply and let's talk. And if you found this useful, sharing Daily Inference with a colleague is the best compliment you can give. See you tomorrow.